Evolution and Darwin
Charles Darwin’s grandfather was a famous biologist, and his father was a medical doctor. Charles started college studying medicine (he was supposed to be a doctor “just like Dad”), but didn’t like it and dropped out. He was interested in studying all the living organisms in the world around him: he wanted to be a naturalist. In the 1800s, typically most men who went to college and were not studying to become a doctor or lawyer studied theology (theos = God, god), including anyone who wanted to learn more about any of the sciences or mathematics. Thus, Charles went back to school to study theology to be a naturalist, studying under a chergyman who was a botanist. In typical college student fashion, he eventually graduated, then decided to see the world before settling down. Thus, at age 22, he got a job as ship’s naturalist on the HMS Beagle and joined the crew as they sailed (literally) around the world. While the sailors were busy keeping the ship headed in the right direction, he was responsible for doing a survey of the flora (plants) and fauna (animals) living in the areas they visited. From England, the ship sailed across the Atlantic, down the east coast of South America and back up the west coast, then across the Pacific, past Australia, around Africa, and back to England.
Ecuador, South America Darwin is especially noted for his work on the Galapagos Islands (located in the Pacific Ocean off Ecuador, S. Amer.). On these islands, he found 14 species of finches (related to our goldfinches and housefinches). He theorized that these 14 species were all derived from one species that had somehow gotten there from the mainland, then diversified. Whereas most finches eat seeds (our local goldfinches like thistle seed), some of Darwin’s Finches eat large seeds, some eat small seeds, some eat insects, and some even use cactus spines and twigs as tools to pry insects out of crevices. Many more scientists have subsequently studied Darwin’s Finches, and this has led to a whole specialized branch of biology called Island Biogeography.
While, in general, after this trip, his health was not good, Darwin did marry a woman from the Wedgewood family (as in Wedgewood Pottery). Darwin spent years pouring over all the data he had collected, and forming his famous theory, but put off publishing any of his results or ideas for over 20 years. He did, however, attend scientific meetings and correspond with other scientists of that time, so some other scientists were aware of what he was working on.
The story of how Darwin’s famous work finally came to be published is interesting in that it is a good example of the “politics” of science. In the late 1850s, a man named Alfred Russell Wallace had developed a theory of evolution which was nearly identical to Darwin’s. Then, as now, scientists presented papers at scientific meetings to share their finding with others, and Wallace had requested time to speak at an upcoming conference to officially put forth his theory. Some of Charles Darwin’s friends, including Charles Lyell, heard about this and decided that the credit should to to Darwin, not Wallace. They did this by asking the meeting organizers for a few minutes, just before Wallace, to read aloud excerpts from some of Darwin’s letters and notes to them which dealt with his theory of evolution. Therefore, because Darwin’s theory was presented first, he traditionally, has received all the credit (or blame) for the theory of evolution, while until recently, hardly anyone had ever heard of Alfred Russell Wallace. In general, in science, once someone has given a talk at a conference, (s)he is expected to follow up by publishing the same information in printed form, thus Darwin’s friends then pressured him to get his theory published. Thus in 1859, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, better-know as The Origin of Species, was finally published.
In this landmark book, Charles Darwin made four main points:
Thus in any population, there is, as he put is, descent with modification (changes occur over the generations) due to natural selection (the “pressure” the environment puts on the various genetic varieties in terms of their ability to cope and/or survive). Note that he does not believe in the idea of an innate tendency toward greater perfection (as Lamarck did), nor do organisms willfully “decided” to change, nor does the environment cause any change to occur within an organism. What he does say is that the environment does “select” various changes that just happened to have occurred, in that these spontaneous changes make the organism more or less able to cope with various factors in the environment.
Besides his notes from his trip and his other studies, Darwin also used artificial selection as justification/evidence for his theory: if we, by breeding domesticated plants or animals for a number of generations, can influence their genetics, then Darwin felt that this could also happen in nature. Actually, Darwin never used the word “evolution” (evolut = an unrolling). He used “descent with modification.” Darwin’s thinking was influenced by the work of geologists and paleontologists like Hutton, Smith, and Lyell, and by the work of Malthus.
In the 1930s and 40s, later people combined Darwin’s work, Mendel’s work on genetics, and other new information to form what is called The Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution (synthetic in that it is made up of or based on many smaller parts). Evolution refers to change, or more specifically, the series of changes that have transformed life on Earth from its beginnings until now. Besides Darwin’s and Mendel’s works, this theory is also based on things like:
Environmental pressure or natural selection “allows” organisms with some genes/alleles to survive while others die. Eventually, if enough genetic change accumulates, it can be said that a given population of organisms is a different species than that from which it arose. In other words, speciation has occurred. This adds up to the process of evolution.
A thought for discussion/debate: while Darwin based his theory in part on the idea of artificial selection, in which who gets to breed with whom is decided by act of conscious reason, most biologists, now, try to explain natural selection in terms of pure random chance. Only a few biologists are willing to allow that natural selection may, like artificial selection, also be an act of conscious reason.Copyright © 1997 by J. Stein Carter. All rights reserved.